Send a tip
Tax implications of Supreme Court decision on Obamacare are enormous... and liberty-crushing
Posted: July 1, 2012
On June 28, Chief Justice John Roberts appropriated to himself...in the name of the Supreme Court, o...
On June 28, Chief Justice John Roberts appropriated to himself...in the name of the Supreme Court, of course...the power of taxation granted to Congress under Article I, section 8 of the Constitution. He did so by saving the entire, massive regulatory edifice of Obamacare from constitutional challenge on the pretext that the constitutional power to tax was in fact exercised by Congress in creating that edifice, even though Congress consistently denied that was the case. The result is that the Court's Commerce Power jurisprudence, previously the critical source of most federal regulation of nationwide import, appears now to be subsumed under the taxing power; and worse, that the taxing power is viewed by the supreme law of the land as having no clear limits, or even a defined class of limitations. A tax is what the Court says is a tax, and a tax may be used for any conceivable regulatory end: not buying health insurance, not buying broccoli, not installing energy-efficient windows (Mr. Roberts' own example), failing to patronize public television (not that far-fetched an example, really)
Suggested Buzz Items
Rand Paul calls for nationwide revolt against lawlessness after Supreme Court ruling on Obamacare
Be careful what you wish for: 75% of Obamacare tax to fall onto those making less than $120k
12 incredible quotes about Obamacare
House wants to repeal Obamacare, AGAIN
IRS: Agents Won't Be Enforcers of Obamacare Mandate
comments powered by Disqus.
comments powered by